Abstract CR questions like this...:-(

[miteshsholay]

The current proposal to give college students a broader choice in planning their own courses of study should be abandoned. The students who are supporting the proposal will never be satisfied, no matter what requirements are established. Some of these students have reached their third year without declaring a major. One first-year student has failed to complete four required courses. Several others have indicated a serious indifference to grades and intellectual achievement.
A flaw in the argument is that it does which one of the following?
(A) avoids the issue by focusing on supporters of the proposal
(B) argues circularly by assuming the conclusion is true in stating the premises.
(C) fails to define the critical term "satisfied"
(D) distorts the proposal advocated by opponents
(E) users the term "student" equivocally

Please help me how to answer this question..
I know this is on the LSAT lines. But many GMAT questions are also on the lines of this one.
Source: Master the LSAT
Please let me know if you need me to post the OA

[tim]

in general you should not expect any help on LSAT questions from MGMAT instructors on this forum. The LSAT plays by different rules than the GMAT, so studying LSAT problems is not likely to help you answer GMAT questions and may even steer you in the wrong direction..