by esledge Wed May 02, 2007 8:28 pm
Hi Raj,
Both are grammatically correct because they are parallel, but "costs associated with X and Y" is preferable to "costs associated with X and with Y" because it is shorter.
In general, the benefits of parallel construction in sentences are better concision and clarity.
For concision, you want the parallelism to begin as late as possible in the sentence:
"...costs associated with (X and Y)"
has as many words as possible "shared" by the two endings of the sentence, thus requires fewer words overall.
However, if the sentence is more complicated, with the items in the list separated by a lot of text, you might want to repeat the "with" for clarity of meaning. For example:
"...costs associated (with X, which has been a major problem for corporations, and with Y) ..."
makes it easier to understand that X and Y are both things that costs are "associated with."
Let the splits between the answer choices be your guide. If you can't see a reason to repeat the "with" in front of the second item in the list, then pick the choice with the fewer words.
Hope this helps,
Emily Sledge
Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT