Hi,
I have a quick question about this problem:
Barry walks from one end to the other of a 30-meter long moving walkway at a constant rate in 30 seconds, assisted by the walkway. When he reaches the end, he reverses direction and continues walking with the same speed, but this time it takes him 120 seconds because he is traveling against the direction of the moving walkway. If the walkway were to stop moving, how many seconds would it take Barry to walk from one end of the walkway to the other?
(answer choices: 48, 60, 72, 75, 80, CAT 4 Quant #16)
How come you can't posit that since Barry walks from one end to the other in 30 seconds and the walkway is 30 meters long, that the combination of his rate and the walkway's rate is 1m/s? And then, couldn't you also calculate that if it takes him 120 seconds to cross 30 seconds when the walkway is AGAINST his direction, then "Barry minus walkway" equals 0.25m/s? I'm not necessarily clear on what to DO with that information but that's the road I took when I first attacked the problem. It seems strange that they give you both distance and time and you aren't supposed to calculate rate when that's what you would normally do when given this type of information.
Thanks,
M