Math questions from any Manhattan Prep GMAT Computer Adaptive Test.
singhpk2
 
 

Class Act : MGMAT problem, too many equations. Please help.

by singhpk2 Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:56 pm

This is the question from one of the MGMAT online test (Question Code= Class Act):
The ratio of boys to girls in Class A is 3 to 4. The ratio of boys to girls in Class B is 4 to 5. If the two classes were combined, the ratio of boys to girls in the combined class would be 17 to 22. If the number of boys in Class B is one less than the number of boys in Class A, and if the number of girls in Class B is two less than the number of girls in Class A, how many girls are in Class A?

My approach:
Bys Gls
A 3x 4x (from:The ratio of boys to girls in Class A is 3 to 4)
B 4y 5y (from:The ratio of boys to girls in Class B is 4 to 5)
----------------------------
Total Bys=3x+4y
Gls=4x+5y

From: If the two classes were combined, the ratio of boys to girls in the combined class would be 17 to 22
(3x+4y)/(4x+5y)=17/22

From: If the number of boys in Class B is one less than the number of boys in Class A
4y=3x-1

From: if the number of girls in Class B is two less than the number of girls in Class A
5y=4x-2

THE ISSUE:
We have 3 equations for 2 unknowns so numerous solutions can be found.

The options in this MGMAT questions are 8,9,10,11,12

Please help.
singhpk2
 
 

by singhpk2 Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:06 pm

here is the image of it
Image
sanjeev
 
 

Almost

by sanjeev Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:18 pm

hi,

I think you are going well. But your assumption is wrong.
Number of equations doesnt determine the total number of solution. Its the degree of equation which determine the number of solutions.

Example of degree 2 equation, x^2 - 4x + 5 = 0, Here x can have 2 values.
Example of degree 3 equation x^3 - 4x^2 +5 =0, Here we have 3 values.

In all the 3 equations you have (3x + 4y)/ (4x + 5y) = 17/22 -(1)
3x - 1 = 4y -(2)
4x -2 = 5y -(3)
the degree is 1. So you will have only 1 values for x and y.

You were very near to solution. Just substitute the values of 4y and 5y from (2) and (3) in (1)

=> (6x - 1) / (8x -2) = 17/22
=> 132x -22 = 136x -34
=> x = 3

So total number of girls in section A is 4x = 12

Thanks
singhpk2
 
 

by singhpk2 Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:50 pm

Thanks Sanjeev.

Yes, I am able to solve it now.
However, I feel the third condition is unnecessary (may be it is there to confuse us :evil: ).
I was able to get the same answer using eqn(1) and eqn(2).
DCE
 
 

by DCE Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:40 am

I tried doing it the hard way:

I assumed the ratio of number of students in Class A : Class B = k:1

Now the ratio of number of boys : total number of students before and after is as follows

17/39 = (3/7 K + 4/9 ) /(k+1)

k = 7/6

equating this to 7x/9y = 7/6; we get 2x = 3y.

and using the second equation we get perfectly get the answer.

But now if I try something more extraordinary

ratio of number of boys / ratio of number of girls ; we get

3/4 K + 4/5 = (17/22)(k+1)

This gives k = 6/5 which is incorrect; where am I going wrong here.

Thanks
DCE
Guest
 
 

by Guest Mon Aug 11, 2008 5:18 am

Ans : 12

We do not need this eq at all " the ratio of boys to girls in the combined class would be 17 to 22" to answer this . Rest of the information is sufficient to answer
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

by RonPurewal Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:59 am

DCE Wrote:But now if I try something more extraordinary

ratio of number of boys / ratio of number of girls ; we get

3/4 K + 4/5 = (17/22)(k+1)

This gives k = 6/5 which is incorrect; where am I going wrong here.

Thanks
DCE


you can't multiply 3/4 by k, because nothing is 3/4 of the total population of students.

your first approach works, because the number of boys in the first class is actually 3/7 of the total. therefore, boys = (3/7)(total), an expression that reduces to 3k/7 when you put it into a ratio.
on the other hand, nothing is (3/4)(total), so nothing will reduce to 3k/4 in the ratio.

it also doesn't make sense to multiply 17/22 by (k + 1), for pretty much exactly the same reason.
manjk7
Students
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:33 pm
 

Re: Class Act : MGMAT problem, too many equations. Please help.

by manjk7 Fri May 22, 2009 1:48 pm

This is a very simple question no need to solve equations

the number of girls or boys = an integer , and the answers are also given (I think this is not a GMAT type question its too easy )

we know the ratio of B to G is class A (3:4) and in B (4:5) and in Combined (17:22)

so number of girls in class A must be a multiple of 4 so 9,10,11 ......out

that leaves 8 and 12 but it cannot be 8 because of the given conditions

so its 12 ..................it will take no more than 20s secs to answer such questions

oops not even 10 secs
JonathanSchneider
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:40 am
Location: Durham, NC
 

Re: Class Act : MGMAT problem, too many equations. Please help.

by JonathanSchneider Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:47 pm

Yes, nice reasoning. I think this still could appear as a real GMAT question. But it would certainly make it a bit easier!
ctrajaram
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:48 pm
 

Re: Class Act : MGMAT problem, too many equations. Please help.

by ctrajaram Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:34 am

Nice approaches.

BA-> Boys in class A
GA-> Girls in class A
BB-> Boys in class B
GB-> Girls in class B

The other traditional approach could be solve straight for GA just so u can get to what's asked for .

Given:
BA/GA = 3/4 (1)
BB/GB=4/5 (2)
BA+BB/GA+GB = 17/22 (3)
BB = BA-1 (4)
GB=GA-2 (5)

To find: GA

From (3):

22(BA+BB) = 17(GA+GB)

22 [BA+(BA-1)] = 17[GA+(GA-2)]

22 (2BA-1) = 17(2GA-2)

22 (2 (3GA/4) - 1 ) = 17(2GA-2)

11(3GA) - 22 = 34GA - 34

GA= 12
esledge
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1181
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:33 am
Location: St. Louis, MO
 

Re:

by esledge Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:16 pm

Nice variety of approaches! And, I had to verify that this was correct:
Guest Wrote:Ans : 12

We do not need this eq at all " the ratio of boys to girls in the combined class would be 17 to 22" to answer this . Rest of the information is sufficient to answer

Following an algebraic approach as proposed by ctrajaram above, I was in fact able to solve with just given equations (1), (2), (4), and (5). It's very unusual for the GMAT to provide extra information on a problem solving question, but not completely impossible.
Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT