by esledge Wed May 23, 2007 8:20 pm
Yes, that is DS#183 from the OG 10th edition. The same problem appears in the Official Guide for Quant Review (11th ed.) as DS#78. Here it is for the record:
Is x^2 greater than x?
(1) x^2 is greater than 1.
(2) x is greater than -1.
This problem is actually testing more than one thing.
It is testing fractions vs. integers because it asks you to compare x^2 to x^1, and proper fractions get smaller when squared (e.g. (1/2)^2 = 1/4, a smaller value than 1/2). In contrast, integers (and larger fractions such as 3/2) get larger when squared (e.g. 2^2 = 4, a larger value than 2). Thus, you should use FIZ to remind you to test fractions, integers, and zero values.
It is testing positives vs. negatives, too, because one of the expressions has an even exponent. Even exponents "hide the sign" of the base: (-10)^2 = (10)^2 = 100. Thus, you should use NPZ to remind you to test negative, positive, and zero values.
Here are some general suggestions to ensure you don’t miss testing certain scenarios on DS Yes/No questions. Either of these might help; you don’t necessarily need to do both for a given problem:
Suggestion #1: When in doubt, use both NPZ and FIZ. This covers all of the bases: negative and positive fractions, negative and positive integers, as well as zero. Also, consider both proper fractions (e.g. 1/2) and improper fractions (e.g. 3/2).
Suggestion #2: In this problem, instead of starting by generating the possible x values, you could start by generating a list for whatever expression is mentioned in the statements. For example, statement (1) tells us that x^2 > 1. So, you would make a list of possible values for x^2: {x^2: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc.} Only then would you take the square root to solve for the possible values of x: {x: +/- sqrt(2), +/-sqrt(3), +2, -2, +/-sqrt(5), etc.). Doing so would give you a chance to catch the negative possibilities for x, which I believe you missed the first time around.
I hope this helps. Best regards,
Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT