Math problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
arielle.bertman
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:30 am
 

During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by arielle.bertman Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:39 pm

During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled at an average speed of x miles per hour for the first y miles of the trip and and at an average speed of 1.25x mph for the last 40-y miles of the trip. The time that Marla took to travel the 40 miles was what percent of the time it would have taken her if she has traveled at an average speed of x miles per hour for the entire trip?

1) x = 48
2) y = 20

Can you show how you would rephrase the question stem and what the RTD table would look like? I conceptually get why B (#2 is sufficient) but I dont think I know how to simply the question. The "what percent of time" is throwing me off.

Thanks!
tomslawsky
Students
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:07 pm
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by tomslawsky Wed Aug 05, 2009 11:55 pm

1) T= D/R

2) Question asks for T1/T2

3) Second statement says Y=20

4) Set up equation using Y=20:

(D1/R1)/(D2/R2)=

100 X [(20/R1) X (R2/20)]

5) Plug in Rates:

(20/X) X (1.25X/20)

6) At this point, realize that the "X"'s cross out, stop calculating and realize that B is sufficient.
Ben Ku
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:49 pm
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by Ben Ku Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:46 pm

I like to draw a diagram when attacking these questions, so I can visualize what's going on. Then I try to break down the information given in the question, and what I'm looking for.

From the question, I see that there are two situations we are comparing:
(1) The time for traveling x mph for the first y miles and 1.25x mph for the last 40-y miles. We'll call this T1.
(2) The time for traveling x mph the entire 40 miles. We'll call this T2.

We want to find T1 / T2 * 100%

Let's rephrase T2 first. Time = Distance / Rate, so T2 = 40 miles / x mph = 40/x hours.

Now let's take a look at T1. Using an RTD Chart:
----------Rate * Time = Distance-----
1st Part x mph * ?? = y miles
2nd Part 1.25x mph * ?? = 40-y miles

The time for the first part is y/x hours, and the time for the second part is (40-y)/(1.25x) hours.

Now let's plug these values for T1 and T2 into the the formula.
T1 / T2 * 100%
= [(40-y)/(1.25x)] / (40/x) * 100%
= [(40-y)/(1.25x)][x / 40] * 100%
= [(100)(40-y)]/[(40)(1.25)]

Our rephrased question is "what is y?"

Clearly (2) alone is clearly sufficient, so (B) is the answer. Hope that helps.
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
victorgsiu
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 4:29 pm
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by victorgsiu Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:35 am

Ben,

Don't you mean:

T1/T2 = [ y/x + (40-y/1.25x)] / (40/x) ?


Ben Ku Wrote:I like to draw a diagram when attacking these questions, so I can visualize what's going on. Then I try to break down the information given in the question, and what I'm looking for.

From the question, I see that there are two situations we are comparing:
(1) The time for traveling x mph for the first y miles and 1.25x mph for the last 40-y miles. We'll call this T1.
(2) The time for traveling x mph the entire 40 miles. We'll call this T2.

We want to find T1 / T2 * 100%

Let's rephrase T2 first. Time = Distance / Rate, so T2 = 40 miles / x mph = 40/x hours.

Now let's take a look at T1. Using an RTD Chart:
----------Rate * Time = Distance-----
1st Part x mph * ?? = y miles
2nd Part 1.25x mph * ?? = 40-y miles

The time for the first part is y/x hours, and the time for the second part is (40-y)/(1.25x) hours.

Now let's plug these values for T1 and T2 into the the formula.
T1 / T2 * 100%
= [(40-y)/(1.25x)] / (40/x) * 100%
= [(40-y)/(1.25x)][x / 40] * 100%
= [(100)(40-y)]/[(40)(1.25)]

Our rephrased question is "what is y?"

Clearly (2) alone is clearly sufficient, so (B) is the answer. Hope that helps.
Ben Ku
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:49 pm
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by Ben Ku Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:08 am

victorgsiu Wrote:Ben,

Don't you mean:

T1/T2 = [ y/x + (40-y/1.25x)] / (40/x) ?


You're right! Thanks for the catch. Victor's correct expression can be simplified:

T1/T2 = [ y/x + (40-y/1.25x)] / (40/x)
= (y + (40-y)/1.25)/40
= (1.25y + 40 - y) / 50
= (0.25 y + 40)/50

In other words, the rephrasing is still "what is y?"
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
vishalsahdev03
Students
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:09 pm
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by vishalsahdev03 Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:02 pm

"what percent of the time it would have taken her if she has traveled at an average speed of x miles per hour for the entire trip? "

I had problems trying to understand, of what value is the question asking the percentage of !!
can someone pls break this statement me !

Thanks in advance !
Ben Ku
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:49 pm
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by Ben Ku Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:27 pm

During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled at an average speed of x miles per hour for the first y miles of the trip and and at an average speed of 1.25x mph for the last 40-y miles of the trip. The time that Marla took to travel the 40 miles was what percent of the time it would have taken her if she has traveled at an average speed of x miles per hour for the entire trip?

The actual time Marta spent, let's call that T1, is the combination of the first y miles at x mph and the second 40-y miles at 1.25x mph.

If she had traveled x mph the whole time, her new time T2 = 40/x.

The question is asking T1 is what percent of T2? In other words, T1 = (P/100)*T2.

Hope that makes sense.
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
NNadjmabadi1
Course Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:08 am
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by NNadjmabadi1 Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:08 am

I'm having trouble seeing why the x's cancel out. Can you explain that part?
messi10
Course Students
 
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 2:18 am
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by messi10 Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:46 am

Hi NNadjmabadi1,

I am assuming that you are ok up to this part:
Ben Ku Wrote:T1/T2 = [ y/x + (40-y/1.25x)] / (40/x)


After this, you can take 1/x out common as a factor from both numerator and denominator. To better visualize this, I will use a new variable z, which is equal to 1/x. Also, I will treat numerator (T1) and denominator (T2) separately. Lets take the numerator and replace 1/x with z

T1 = yz + z(40-y)/1.25
= z [y + (40-y)/1.25]

Do the same with the denominator

T2 = 40z
= z(40)

Now you can see that z is common between Numerator and Denominator and can be cancelled out.

Regards

Sunil
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by RonPurewal Sat Jul 30, 2011 3:17 am

yep
virginia.c.chan
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:20 pm
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by virginia.c.chan Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:15 pm

Hello,

I understand the explanations given (thank you), but I had a question. I initially grouped the two rates together so then tried to solve by dividing total distance over total rate to get the total time.

Total distance: y + (40-y) = 40

Total rate: x + 1.25x = 2.25x

Obviously that cancelled out the y's and I didn't get to the right answer, but I was just wondering why I can't do it this way (I thought it was like the average rate thing where the formula is total distance/time).

Thanks in advance.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by RonPurewal Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:03 pm

virginia.c.chan Wrote:Hello,

I understand the explanations given (thank you), but I had a question. I initially grouped the two rates together so then tried to solve by dividing total distance over total rate to get the total time.

Total distance: y + (40-y) = 40

Total rate: x + 1.25x = 2.25x

Obviously that cancelled out the y's and I didn't get to the right answer, but I was just wondering why I can't do it this way (I thought it was like the average rate thing where the formula is total distance/time).

Thanks in advance.


if you use a certain fact to generate variable expressions, you can't plug those expressions right back into the same fact -- you have to combine them with something else.
if you plug back into the same fact that you used to generate the variable expressions in the first place, then you will *always* get a tautological expression in which everything cancels out everything else.
AishwaryaK584
Students
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:25 pm
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by AishwaryaK584 Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:10 am

Hello

I have a question on this. Sorry this is a basic question. I don't understand the simplification for [y/x +(40-y)/ 1.25x] * (x/40) How are u cancelling out all the x's? You can only cancel out 2x's here. How area cancelling all out?
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by tim Mon Jul 28, 2014 2:16 pm

Try using the distributive property first. Then you'll have two fractions added together, but both of them have an x on top and an x on bottom, which can be canceled out. Let us know if you need any further help with this one.
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: During a 40-mile trip, Marla traveled

by RonPurewal Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:42 am

AishwaryaK584 Wrote:Hello

I have a question on this. Sorry this is a basic question. I don't understand the simplification for [y/x +(40-y)/ 1.25x] * (x/40) How are u cancelling out all the x's? You can only cancel out 2x's here. How area cancelling all out?


You probably know that, for instance, 3(x + y) = 3x + 3y. Note that the 3 is multiplied by both of the terms in the addition.

The x/40 does the same thing here, allowing the x to "cancel" the x's in both denominators.