Hi Guys,
I have just begun with my GMAT preps.
I attempted this on the first MGMAT I took.
Would be great if some one can provide constructive feedback and grade my attempt. Oblige.
ESSAY QUESTION:
The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:
"The inflow of immigrant workers into our community has put a downward pressure on wages. In fact, the average compensation of unskilled labor in our city has declined by nearly 10% over the past 5 years. Therefore, to protect our local economy, it is essential to impose a moratorium on further immigration."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.
RESPONSE:
The argument in question is based on certain assumptions. Also there are other factors which might have an effect on the soundness of the conclusion of the argument, have not been considered by the author. Owing to this, the argument in question is weak. It would need to be substantiated with pertaining evidence for it to hold true.
The argument assumes that immigrant workers charge less to do the same work as the natives and this has caused a decline in the wages of the overall unskilled worker community. There is a 10% decline in the wages over the past 5 years as per the argument. This fact can also be due to the rapid technological advances in the past half decade. The hard laborious work which was done previously by the unskilled workers might be taken care of by automated machines leaving little for the workers to actually do. Since there might be only relatively easier tasks for the workers to do, the compensation for the work done would have dropped proportionately.
Also there is no mention about the work available to the workers through out these five years. If the amount of work available has been gradually decreasing while the worker class number has remained constant then more no of workers would have been rendered unemployed. Due to this there would be an obvious decline in the average compensation that is met out.
The state of economy during these 5 years is also not considered by the author of the argument. If the local economy was hit by recession, not only the worker class but also all the other classes too would have been affected by the downturn seriously weakening the argument presented by the author.
Further, the argument concludes that it is essential to impose a moratorium on further immigration altogether which is flawed. The examples cited by the author are of the unskilled worker class alone, the immigrants might include skilled workers who may be helping the local economy grow. It would thus be inappropriate to restrict all kinds of immigrants.
Evidence regarding the pay scale being met out to the unskilled immigrant workers, technological advances during the past 5 years and the state of economy and hence the work available should be examined before drawing a conclusion.