guest Wrote:well also i think they word things badly...they dont make it clear that they want 60% of the remaining employees...i was thinking 60% of the original 800 employees...
a couple of comments here:
* that's actually the only reasonable interpretation of the wording. here's an analogy to show that the alternative interpretation (= % of the original number) doesn't make sense: imagine that a school originally has 50 boys and 50 girls, so that its student body is 50% girls. now, let's say all the boys leave, and 10 girls leave as well, so that only 40 girls (and no boys) are left.
would you now say that the percentage of girls at the school is 40% (= 40/100)? no, of course you wouldn't; it's now 100%, because
you have to divide by the current total. you can never calculate a percentage by dividing a
current portion by a
previous total. while i wouldn't expect you to come up with analogies such as this one on the fly, you may want to try to think in terms of such analogies if you ever find yourself questioning the wording of a problem.
* i understand that being caught misinterpreting answer choices like this one is frustrating - it's the same way i feel when i totally misconstrue something said to me in a foreign language. however, try to parlay that frustration into a better understanding of the 'language' spoken by your interlocutor (which in this case is the gmat). in other words, you should
try to learn the way the gmat words its problems. it has a special, super-precise 'dialect' all its own, which you would be extremely well advised to get used to.