This question pertains to sample problem about Liam's actual and hypothetical rate: Chapter 11, p. 171.
Although i understand the explanation upon close examination, the thinking behind the rate and time relationships described in the RTD chart is not as intuitive as my way of approaching the problem. I got the same answer by setting up the RTD chart (relationships) differently. Please confirm that the alternate approach is equally valid.
Original (see text for rationale):
_______Rate___X___Time___ =___Distance
Actual__r + 5____30/(r +5)_______ 30
Hyp_____r ________30/r _________30
equation set-up, 30/r = 30/ (r + 5) + 1/15
Alternate set-up: the way i had translated the word problem is more literal to the question stem, while the original, text-book version had a slight inversion of thinking. Since the hypothetical rate was 5 miles less than the actual rate, i made the actual rate r, and the Hyp rate r-5. Similarly, since Liam arrived 4 minutes earlier under the actual rate, i subtracted 1/15 minutes from the hypo time (see equation).
_______Rate___X___Time___ =___Distance
Actual___r__________30/r_________ 30
Hyp____r - 5 ______30/(r-5)________30
equation set-up, 30/r = 30/ (r - 5) - 1/15
* Please confirm that my way of thinking will also conclusively arrive at the right answer every time for this type of problem.