Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
Aj
 
 

Intended primarily to stimulate family summer travel,

by Aj Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:55 am

Intended primarily to stimulate family summer travel,
the new airfare, which allows both an adult and a
child to fly for the price of one ticket, and also
shortens the advance-purchase requirement for family
travel to a minimum of seven days rather than
fourteen.

(A) and also shortens the advance-purchase require-
ment for family travel to a minimum of seven
days rather than
(B) and also lessens the advance-purchase
requirement for family travel to a seven-day
minimum from
(C) also shortens the advance-purchase requirement
for family travel to a minimum of seven days
rather than that of
(D) also lessens the advance-purchase requirement
for family travel to a seven-day minimum from
(E) also shortens the advance-purchase requirement
for family travel to a minimum of seven days
rather than
Suyash
 
 

by Suyash Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:21 pm

Would go for C.We do not require another and,hence eliminate 3 choices.Usage of seven day minimum is ambiguous.Hence C.
guest
 
 

by guest Thu Aug 14, 2008 3:59 pm

WILL GO FOR "E"
Hanumayamma
 
 

Intended primarily to stimulate family summer travel,

by Hanumayamma Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:00 pm

A, B makes the sentence fragment - eliminate it.
Among C, D and E:
D: lessen (requires two comparable entities) - Eliminate it
E: Good one but it compares days with number - eliminate it
Answer: C
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

by RonPurewal Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:51 am

i'd go with (e). PLEASE POST OFFICIAL ANSWERS ALONG WITH QUESTIONS.

* "and" at the beginning is inappropriate. here's why:
the new airfare, which allows both an adult and a child to fly for the price of one ticket, and also shortens
the yellow part is a modifier, which can be eliminated in the determination of subject-verb agreement. clearly, we need to write "the new airfare shortens...", and not "the new airfare and also shortens...".

* "lessen" is a weird word to use in this sort of context. usually, "lessen" is used with abstract qualities such as tension, disagreement, excitement, and so forth; i've never seen "lessen" used for discrete quantitative things (such as numbers of days, in this problem).

* "seven-day minimum" is awkward by gmat standards; i recall a question in the purple OG verbal supplement in which "two-year low level" was labeled as awkward, so we can assume that "seven-day minimum" would be subject to the same rules. what's more, if you use the adjective "seven-day", then "fourteen" isn't parallel to anything, as it would have to be followed by a hyphen.
"minimum of seven days" is better.

* "that of" doesn't make any sense, because nothing belongs to fourteen.

--

the writing here is sloppier than that usually employed on the gmat; i find it weird to say that an airfare "shortens a requirement". to me, an airfare is just a price, so it can't shorten anything; you'd have to say that the deal, or the airline itself, "shortens" the requirement. it's uncharacteristic of the gmat to contain problems with such sloppy wording.
oh well.
at least the problem is present in all of the answer choices, so that you don't have to worry about it.
vishalsahdev03
Students
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:09 pm
 

Re: Intended primarily to stimulate family summer travel,

by vishalsahdev03 Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:21 pm

To
ManhattanGMAT Staff:

I opted D because it says

"lessens X to Y from Z"

which to me seemed better than

"shortens X to Y rather than Z"

I felt, that lessens with from here makes more sense that shortens with rather than.
I felt that "rather than" can not be used with "shortens", is that a idiom or something?
which structure is better?

I usually look at the structure because this also saves time, Is that a correct approach, please suggest?
I understand your explanations but i followed this thought of line, please guide !

Thanks in advance.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Intended primarily to stimulate family summer travel,

by RonPurewal Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am

vishalsahdev03 Wrote:I felt that "rather than" can not be used with "shortens", is that a idiom or something?


totally separate construction. it's just "Y rather than Z", in your notation.

here's an analogy:
"i'll take the shrimp rather than the steak"
same thing here: the parallel construction is just the shrimp rather than the steak. there's no idiom with "take".
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Intended primarily to stimulate family summer travel,

by RonPurewal Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:44 am

also, super important:

the last part of the sentence is a parallel construction using the word "fourteen" BY ITSELF.

since the second half of the parallel construction contains the word "fourteen" alone, the first half must contain the standalone word "seven".

i.e.,
* seven days rather than fourteen (days) is a properly parallel construction. (note that you can elide the word "days"; you don't have to say it twice.)
* a seven-day minimum rather than fourteen is not parallel.