Math questions from any Manhattan Prep GMAT Computer Adaptive Test.
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: Is the positive integer N a perfect square?

by jnelson0612 Sun Nov 20, 2011 12:47 am

The answer to this problem is D. Let us know if you need more clarification.
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
shetty.nagraj1
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:53 am
 

Re: Is the positive integer N a perfect square?

by shetty.nagraj1 Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:07 pm

jnelson0612 Wrote:The answer to this problem is D. Let us know if you need more clarification.


Hi,

The explanation says " the sums of the factors are odd" -- which is makes sense and is correct.

however in the stem, the second statement states "(2) The sum of all distinct factors of N is even."

Then the answer should be A, shouldnt it?

Pls can you help me understand if I am missing something here.

Thank you.
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Is the positive integer N a perfect square?

by tim Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:58 pm

if a number is to be a square, its factors have to add to an odd number. this is true. now with that in mind let's take a look at statement 2 and ask if it helps to answer the question:

the question is: is N a perfect square?

statement 2 says the factors of N add to an even number. from this we conclude that N must not be a perfect square. now let's answer the question:

is N a perfect square? NO!

we know the answer to the question - it is NO!

remember, whenever you KNOW the answer to the question - as we do here - the statement is sufficient. so statement 2 is sufficient.

the ONLY time a statement is insufficient is when it does not answer the question at the top of the page.
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
shetty.nagraj1
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:53 am
 

Re: Is the positive integer N a perfect square?

by shetty.nagraj1 Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:16 pm

thank you Tim.

I realized that I overlooked the sufficiency in getting No from both the statements. my bad.

I ll take care next time.

thanks again.

cheers.
Nagraj
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: Is the positive integer N a perfect square?

by jnelson0612 Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:32 pm

Great!
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
jatin
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:26 pm
 

Re: Is the positive integer N a perfect square?

by jatin Tue Feb 10, 2015 5:33 am

One is a perfect square.
But, the sum of distinct factors of one is one, which is odd. Therefore, the B is insufficient.
Am I wrong?

Regards,
Tanuj
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Is the positive integer N a perfect square?

by RonPurewal Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:50 pm

jatin Wrote:One is a perfect square.
But, the sum of distinct factors of one is one, which is odd. Therefore, the B is insufficient.
Am I wrong?

Regards,
Tanuj


this case is not relevant to either statement. take another look at the statements.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Is the positive integer N a perfect square?

by RonPurewal Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:53 pm

jatin Wrote:One is a perfect square.
But, the sum of distinct factors of one is one, which is odd. Therefore, the B is insufficient.
Am I wrong?

Regards,
Tanuj


okay, i think i see what you're trying to do here: you're working the whole problem backward.

it seems you're taking perfect squares, and then asking yourself "does this satisfy the numbered statements?"
this is not how DS works.
you have to start from the statements, and use that information to answer the question.

so, for statement 1, you think ONLY about numbers that have an even # of factors. the number 1 does not, so it is irrelevant.
for statement 2, you think ONLY about numbers that have an even sum of factors. again the number 1 fails to satisfy the criterion, so, again, it is irrelevant.