Math questions from any Manhattan Prep GMAT Computer Adaptive Test.
asharma8080
Course Students
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:36 am
 

Machine A and Machine B - XYZ

by asharma8080 Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:10 pm

Machine A, working alone at a constant rate, can complete a certain production lot in x hours. Machine B, working alone at a constant rate, can complete 1/5 of the same production lot in y hours. Machines A and B, working together, can complete 1/2 of the same production lot in z hours. What is the value of y in terms of x and z?

A. (5x - 10z)/ 2xz
B (2xz) / (5x - 10z)
C. (5xz)/ (x + z)
D. xz/ x + z
E. xz/ x + 2z

I started with the algebra approach and it started to get ugly and then paused but then I could not decide whether to plug-in here or not and ended up wasting valuable time in trying to make that decision. Is there something in this problem that tells us that plugging is going to suck?

I ended up seeing the algebraic solution afterwards and have no problems with that approach.
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: Machine A and Machine B - XYZ

by jnelson0612 Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:20 pm

asharma8080 Wrote:Machine A, working alone at a constant rate, can complete a certain production lot in x hours. Machine B, working alone at a constant rate, can complete 1/5 of the same production lot in y hours. Machines A and B, working together, can complete 1/2 of the same production lot in z hours. What is the value of y in terms of x and z?

A. (5x - 10z)/ 2xz
B (2xz) / (5x - 10z)
C. (5xz)/ (x + z)
D. xz/ x + z
E. xz/ x + 2z

I started with the algebra approach and it started to get ugly and then paused but then I could not decide whether to plug-in here or not and ended up wasting valuable time in trying to make that decision. Is there something in this problem that tells us that plugging is going to suck?

I ended up seeing the algebraic solution afterwards and have no problems with that approach.


See, I don't think that this problem has to suck by plugging numbers. :-) I just did it with a tutoring student.

Here's what we did:
1) We decided that the job would be 30 widgets.
2) We decided that x=6, so A completes the job in six hours, or builds 5 widgets per hour.
3) We decided that y=2, so B completes 1/5 of the job in 2 hours. 1/5 of the job is 6 widgets, so 6 widgets/2 hours = 3 widgets.
4) We now know that together A + B complete 8 widgets per hour. The problem says they can do half the lot (15 widgets) in z hours. Thus rate (8 widgets) * time = work (15 widgets). Time is 15/8. z=15/8
5) Now, the question asks what is y in terms of x and z? y=2 and x=6 and z=less than 2.
6) Estimate. C is too big. A and E are too small. Run the actual numbers in B and D. Run D first; it's easier and if it doesn't work you can just pick B and move on. B is in fact the answer and checks out perfectly.

It's certainly a little more time consuming as a plug in question, but not impossible. :-)
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
nocheivyirene
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:06 pm
 

Re: Machine A and Machine B - XYZ

by nocheivyirene Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:18 pm

asharma8080 Wrote:Machine A, working alone at a constant rate, can complete a certain production lot in x hours. Machine B, working alone at a constant rate, can complete 1/5 of the same production lot in y hours. Machines A and B, working together, can complete 1/2 of the same production lot in z hours. What is the value of y in terms of x and z?

A. (5x - 10z)/ 2xz
B (2xz) / (5x - 10z)
C. (5xz)/ (x + z)
D. xz/ x + z
E. xz/ x + 2z



My approach:
Let production = 1
Rate of A + Rate of B = Rate Together

1/x + 1/5y = 1/2z

Separate 1/5y since we want y.

1/5y = 1/2z - 1/x
1/5y = (x-2z)/2xz

Multiply both sides by 5

1/y = 5x - 10z / 2xz
y = 2xz / (5x - 10z)

Answer: B
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Machine A and Machine B - XYZ

by tim Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:51 pm

:)
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
krishnagmat
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:00 pm
 

Re: Machine A and Machine B - XYZ

by krishnagmat Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:15 pm

It took me about 3 minues to solve this problem but I thought it can be simply done in few seconds by just substituting values.

Eg, let say Z=X , that means only A performs the entire task. The remaining time should be Zero.

In some questions we may consider few other scenarios like this.
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Machine A and Machine B - XYZ

by tim Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:34 am

Z=X won't work here given the specific conditions of the problem (see if you can figure out why!), but in general this type of approach is good to use on problems with variables in the answer choices.
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
JbhB682
Course Students
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 2:13 pm
 

Re: Machine A and Machine B - XYZ

by JbhB682 Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:33 pm

Another approach -- took me 3.5 mins though :(

Assuming 1 production unit

Time for A : x for 1 production unit

Time for B :
-- y for 1/5 production unit
-- 5 y for 1 production unit

so time for B for 1 production unit -- 5 y

Combined times for 1 production unit : product of times of A and B / sum of times of A and B

So thats (x times 5y) / (x + 5y) for 1 production unit

Now z is half a production unit so we need to halve the above equation

z = (1/2) [5xy / (x+5y)]

re-arrange and isolate Y - you get B

Takes some time though and potential for error given the movement :( ...but right answer
Sage Pearce-Higgins
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1336
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:04 am
 

Re: Machine A and Machine B - XYZ

by Sage Pearce-Higgins Sun Jul 16, 2017 8:29 am

:)