by RonPurewal Mon May 21, 2012 5:56 am
this is not anything "gmat-specific". it's a mathematical convention followed worldwide, with no exceptions anywhere. and, no, there's no contradiction.
the point is this: symbols / operators have to mean ONE thing. they can't be ambiguous.
so, the problem that lies before us is to define the "√" sign IN ONE WAY, just as in the case of any other symbol.
there are two choices:
1/ we could make "√n" stand for the negative value;
2/ we could make "√n" stand for the positive value.
i don't think i need to explain why #1 would be absurd here, so, accordingly, the convention is #2.
also, it's a darned good thing that symbols only mean one thing.
for instance, how long is the diagonal of a square with 1-inch sides?
"√2", you say.
you're right.
if the "√" symbol were allowed to be either positive or negative, then it would actually be impossible to answer this simple question.
--
when you have an EQUATION, though -- like "x^2 = 9" -- this issue isn't in play, because there is no "√" symbol that you are trying to define uniquely. "solving" an equation means finding ALL numbers that make the statement true, so there will be two solutions to equations like these.
in any case, it's a misrepresentation to write that this is a "GMAT convention", as that would imply the possibility of finding some remote mathematical outpost, somewhere, where "√n" is allowed to stand for a negative value. not true -- the same convention is followed everywhere, for the reasons outlined above.