Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
Guest
 
 

Not one of the potential investors

by Guest Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:54 pm

Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if he deal were not to be concluded.

(A)is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if he deal were
(B)is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
(C)is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if he deal were
(D)are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
(E)are expected to be making an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were

Answer: A
I picked E but realized that "are" cannot go with "one" because are is plural and "Not one" is singular. I don't understand why the correct answer is "deal were" and not "deal was." Could someone please explain?

Thanks in Advance!
kylo
 
 

by kylo Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:30 am

is the question correct.

".............if he deal were not to be concluded." - sounds awkward in A.


Thanks!
guest
 
 

Typo!

by guest Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:52 am

Typo! Sorry!
It's "...if the deal were..." NOT if he deal were!!!
JonathanSchneider
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:40 pm
 

by JonathanSchneider Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:14 pm

This issue (deal were vs. deal was) can be settled by following the rules for the Hypothetical Subjunctive. If you have a copy of our SC guide book, check the top of page 134. Basically, we use "were" to express that something is not really the case.
aarthi.kunnath
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:58 am
 

Re: Not one of the potential investors

by aarthi.kunnath Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:58 am

Hello,

I had chosen option C
C. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were

I recognized that this needs the subjunctive - deal were but chose C over A because of be signed to go with the subjunctive deal were

Can the instructors plz explain what's wrong with my reasoning?

Thank you!
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Not one of the potential investors

by RonPurewal Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:35 am

aarthi.kunnath Wrote:Hello,

I had chosen option C
C. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were

I recognized that this needs the subjunctive - deal were but chose C over A because of be signed to go with the subjunctive deal were

Can the instructors plz explain what's wrong with my reasoning?

Thank you!


Nope -- just because the subjunctive is used in one of the verbs, it doesn't have to be used in all of them.

you're thinking of the "command subjunctive". this form is used only in certain structures -- and ALL of those structures are preceded by "that".
For instance:
it is important that you be on time.
the boss demanded that his employees be at work half an hour before the start of the shift.
etc.

also, not only does this construction not satisfy the grammatical requirements of the command subjunctive; it doesn't satisfy the contextual requirements, either. Usually, the command subjunctive is used only in contexts involving some kind of demand, request, or statement of importance. This context is none of the above, and therefore does not merit the use of the command subjunctive.
aarthi.kunnath
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:58 am
 

Re: Not one of the potential investors

by aarthi.kunnath Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:59 pm

Thank you Ron!
poonammarwah23
Students
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:49 pm
 

Re: Not one of the potential investors

by poonammarwah23 Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:08 am

Hi Ron,
I have rejected B and C because they and them do not have any referent.

Am I correct?

Thanks!
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Not one of the potential investors

by RonPurewal Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:21 am

poonammarwah23 Wrote:Hi Ron,
I have rejected B and C because they and them do not have any referent.

Am I correct?

Thanks!


actually, the problem isn't that there's no referent - it's that the existing referent doesn't make any sense.

grammatically, "they/them" could refer to "potential investors". but, in context, that wouldn't make any sense.
in context, we're talking about the bank (and possibly also the potential investor ... but definitely the bank) signing the agreement. that doesn't work with this pronoun.
poonammarwah23
Students
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:49 pm
 

Re: Not one of the potential investors

by poonammarwah23 Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:10 am

Thank You Ron!
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Not one of the potential investors

by RonPurewal Fri Mar 05, 2010 6:33 am

poonammarwah23 Wrote:Thank You Ron!


glad it helped