The following is a paragraph from an article about local organic farming vs. conventional in terms of organic efficiency.
I don't understand the last three lines (the quotes confuse me). Can someone please decipher this for me?
--------------
If small farming turns out to be more energy efficient, Martin believes it might also be a good way to save disappearing fields. "Farmland around the urban edges is probably lost at a greater rate than any other," she says. "In Illinois, this is good soil that we’re losing to development." Small, diversified farms might be more stalwart than corn-and-soy farms, "where the economic balance is, how are the subsidies looking this year? At some point it’s just going to tip over to development. Small-scale diversified is a growing market with lots of demand."
-----------------
Thanks,
SJ