On page 62, the question asked me to correct the underlined part of the following sentence:
Dr. Crock's claims have been not corroborated by other scientists or published in a prestigious journal but have nonetheless garnered a great deal of attention from the public.
And the answer on page 64 is:
Dr. Crock's claims have not been corroborated by other scientists or published in a prestigious journal but have nonetheless garnered a great deal of attention from the public.
My question is (and I've looked through many posts about this sentence but none of them answered MY confusion):
I assume the question is testing us about the "not... but..." parallelism. Since the first"have" in the sentence appeared in front of the "not", why do we still need a "have" after "but"? I know that in "parallelism" sentences we should repeat "subordinators" in order to remove ambiguity, but "have" is not a "subordinator"; it's just part of a "working verb". Why can't the following sentence be correct:
Dr. Crock's claims have not been corroborated by other scientists or published in a prestigious journal but nonetheless garnered a great deal of attention from the public.
Thank you very much! :)