This maybe silly but im trying to understand how to isolate the conclusion in an argument.
Medical education in the United States has focused almost exclusively on curative medicine, while preventive care has been given scant attention. This is misguided. Medical schools should invest as much time in teaching their students how to prevent illness as in teaching them how to cure it.
The first sentence 'Medical.... scant attention' is a fact. Hence a premise.
'This is misguided.' is an opinion - hence a possible conclusion.
'Medical ..... cure it' is an opinion as well.
Is this a case for the 'therefore' strategy.
Schools are misguided, therefore, schools must invest as much time in teaching...
Schools must invest in teaching...., therefore, schools are misguided