If you're experiencing a roadblock with one of the Manhattan Prep GMAT math strategy guides, help is here!
mozart611
Course Students
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:17 am
 

Rates & Work Strategy: Population Prblms

by mozart611 Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:24 pm

I tried to solve #4 pg 45 in Word Translations using the equation for exponential growth, but I was unable to. I thought the equation was a faster approach. Here's the question
The population of grasshoppers dbles in a field every year. Apprxly how many yrs will it take to grow from 2,000 to 1,000,000 grasshoppers or more

Eqn for Exp growth: P = S.2^(t/I)

1,000,000 = 2,000. 2^(t/2)

Thnks
StaceyKoprince
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 9360
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:05 am
Location: Montreal
 

Re: Rates & Work Strategy: Population Prblms

by StaceyKoprince Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:57 am

I do actually like just writing these out (the way it's done in the book). You don't even have to write all the zeroes: just know that you're trying to go from 2k to 1,000k and write that out without those last three zeroes. If it can be done this way, this is usually the easiest (read: least likely to make a mistake) way to do the problem.

This is especially true if the question asks you to approximate and / or asks you to solve for not one specific number but "some number or more / less." (Both of these conditions are present in the given problem.)

The generic equation for a doubling population is:

Pop = S*2^(t/I)
where:
Pop = final population
S = starting population
t = time amount of time it takes (what we're looking for)
I = the interval (the amount of time it takes to double)

In this case:
Pop = 1,000,000
S = 2,000
t = unknown
I = 1 year

You have I = 2 in your equation.

So, here's the filled-in equation:
1,000,000 = 2,000*2^(t/2)

And now you can see the problem with using this equation to solve. How do you get that t out of the exponent? The value for t is almost certainly not going to be an integer (otherwise, they wouldn't have said "approximately" and "1,000,000 or more"). The only real way to solve exactly for t here would be to use logs... and you don't have a calculator.

So skip the formula - just use the chart. :)
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director, Content & Curriculum
ManhattanPrep