Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
CrystalSpringston
Students
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:13 am
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by CrystalSpringston Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:02 pm

I have a question on the parallelism.
Why can the "will" omitted in the second clause?

According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing
confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier
in the year and (will) instead come in for a “soft landing,” followed by a gradual increase
in business activity.

I ruled out the correct answer because the the missing of will viloates the parallelism. Don't understand why it is acceptable?

Thank you!
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by tim Thu Sep 17, 2015 7:36 pm

You are going about parallelism (and sentence correction in general) completely backwards: Instead of asking why things are correct, you should be asking why they are incorrect. I appreciate that you've expressed what you think is incorrect about this construction, so I will help you see the error you've made:

You have arbitrarily decided that YOU want the parallel element on the left to start with "will". The thing is, that's not your choice to make; it's the GMAT's. You could just as easily (and just as incorrectly) have decided you wanted to start the first parallel element with "the economy", in which case you would now be asking why the words "the economy will" were omitted after the "and instead". Because you can never know where the GMAT wants the parallel element to start just by looking to the left of the marker, you need to start by looking instead to the right. After the "and instead" (our parallel marker) we see the word "come", which is a verb. Now look to the left to see if you can find a verb: "avoid" is that verb. Now we have perfect parallelism, the "avoid..." portion and the "come..." portion. The preamble ("...the economy will") applies to both of these parts.
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
CrystalSpringston
Students
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:13 am
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by CrystalSpringston Thu Sep 17, 2015 8:07 pm

tim Wrote:You are going about parallelism (and sentence correction in general) completely backwards: Instead of asking why things are correct, you should be asking why they are incorrect. I appreciate that you've expressed what you think is incorrect about this construction, so I will help you see the error you've made:

You have arbitrarily decided that YOU want the parallel element on the left to start with "will". The thing is, that's not your choice to make; it's the GMAT's. You could just as easily (and just as incorrectly) have decided you wanted to start the first parallel element with "the economy", in which case you would now be asking why the words "the economy will" were omitted after the "and instead". Because you can never know where the GMAT wants the parallel element to start just by looking to the left of the marker, you need to start by looking instead to the right. After the "and instead" (our parallel marker) we see the word "come", which is a verb. Now look to the left to see if you can find a verb: "avoid" is that verb. Now we have perfect parallelism, the "avoid..." portion and the "come..." portion. The preamble ("...the economy will") applies to both of these parts.


Hi Tim,
Thank you for your explanation.
I think I got what you said above. In this sentence, GMAT wants to make "avoid" parallelled with "come".
What if they start the parallelism with the "will"? Is it fine to say:
According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead will come in for a “soft landing,” followed by a gradual increase in business activity.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by RonPurewal Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:17 pm

that would also work.
CrystalSpringston
Students
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:13 am
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by CrystalSpringston Sat Sep 19, 2015 7:27 pm

RonPurewal Wrote:that would also work.

Ron, Thanks. It is much clear to me now!
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by tim Tue Sep 22, 2015 10:33 am

Glad to hear it. Keep in mind that there are often several ways to create a parallel structure correctly. Just because you think of one possibility doesn't mean all the other possibilities are wrong.
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
CrystalSpringston
Students
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:13 am
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by CrystalSpringston Tue Sep 22, 2015 10:47 am

tim Wrote:Glad to hear it. Keep in mind that there are often several ways to create a parallel structure correctly. Just because you think of one possibility doesn't mean all the other possibilities are wrong.


Thank you. I really learned something from the mistake made.
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by tim Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:10 am

That's what we're here for! Glad we could help.
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
JohnW717
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:28 pm
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by JohnW717 Sun Nov 10, 2019 3:25 am

Hi instructor,

Can you explain why C is incorrect?

According to OG explantation, "earlier in the year should follow many had feared, rather than preceding it; instead to come does not complete second part of the sentence idiomatically".

According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence in the economy's ability to avoid the recession, something earlier in the year many had feared and in stead to come in for a "soft landing," followed by a gradual increase in business activity.

"instead to come" should be parallel to "to avoid the recession". How is C not idiomatically? Thanks a lot!
Sage Pearce-Higgins
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1336
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:04 am
 

Re: SC: According to some analysts, the gains :

by Sage Pearce-Higgins Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:06 pm

I'm confused. Are we dealing with the same problem here? Your answer C doesn't match with the original problem posted. Also, when you say 'OG explanation', what source are you referring to please? This folder is for problems from GMAT Prep exams, and these problems don't have explanations.

In any case, don't trust official explanations: they are vague and often inconsistent. Let me do my best to explain the problems in the sentence you posted:

According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence in the economy's ability to avoid the recession, something earlier in the year many had feared and instead to come in for a "soft landing," followed by a gradual increase in business activity.
1. The modifier 'earlier in the year' seems to be modifying the word 'something'. However, the event that took place earlier in the year was people fearing the recession, not the recession itself. Changing the position of a modifier often changes the meaning of a sentence. Consider the different meanings of these two sentences (both of which are correct):
Yesterday I had a dream that my dog ran away.
I had a dream that my dog ran away yesterday.

2. The parallel construction 'to avoid...and...to come' is illogical. If we analyze the parallel construction it seems to say that 'there's growing confidence in the economy's ability to avoid the recession' (this bit is fine), but 'there's growing confidence in the economy's ability to come in for a "soft landing"'. I don't think this makes sense: the "soft landing" part is a prediction about the economy, not an ability.