Source: none, made up to represent an official question.
As the health insurance affordability gap widens, lower-income groups are especially hard-hit, and these groups can no longer qualify to buy insurance, and rising private insurance rates force them to use far more than the standard 20 percent of their incomes for government health services, leaving them with no subsidies or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these groups can no longer qualify to buy insurance, and
(B) since these groups can no longer afford to buy insurance, furthermore
(C) for these groups can no longer afford to buy insurance, yet
(D) and these groups can no longer afford to buy insurance; however,
(E) and these groups can no longer afford to buy insurance, for
Confused between B and C. Is 'for' acceptable to show a cause-effect relation? Please explain your answers.
Thanks