NMencia09 Wrote:Studies of test scores show that watching television has a markedly positive effect on children whose parents speak English as a second language, as compared to those whose native language is English.
to those whose native language is English
with children whose native language is English
with those who are native English speakers
to children whose parents do not
with children whose parents are native English speakers
answer is E.
Is there a rule for Compared TO versus Compared WITH when comparing like vs unlike things?
Answer says D doesnt work because its ambiguous whether or no the parents are native English speakers, but wouldnt that be the implication if you are making this comparison?
i just finished my CAT 5 and also chose D on this answer.
Studies of test scores show that watching television has a markedly positive effect on children whose parents speak English as a second language, as compared
to children whose parents do notI agree with all the answer explanations actually, but I still wanted clarification. In the SC guide where they mention this type of eliding they never gave an example where not only was the action being elided, but the modifier of that action
whose parents speak english
as a second language to children whose parents do not [speak english] [as a second language]
so what exactly is allowed to be "understood" in the comparison? I know the verb "speak" is, and according to the answer explanation the object of the verb speak "english" is.... so can we assume any subsequent modifiers are not understood?
thanks