by arnabgangully Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:54 am
Hi Willy,
I took some time perhaps never permissible during the real exam to decode the OA.
The Argument states that the Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty
Supporting Evidence
of scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty, a disproportionately large number entered their field at an older age than is usual this is a negative * negative situation where the result is positive and this statement is supporting the Argument.
The Expalination is that scientists over forty have generally spent too long in their field.
Hope i made my self clear but the question is a tough one