Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
yu.baba2008
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:59 am
 

scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by yu.baba2008 Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:15 pm

Hi, all

Please can anybody help me with this sentence correction question:

Scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in the fine-grained sediments of a dry riverbed in the Afar region of Ethiopia to between 2.52 and 2.60 million years ago, pushing back by more than 150,000 years the earliest date when it is known that humans made stone tools.

A. when it is known that humans made

B. at which it is known that humans had made

C. at which humans are known to have made

D. that humans are known to be making

E. of humans who were known to make

The ans is c but I chose a. Why a is incorrect?Shouldn't "date" be followed with "when"? And is it necessary to use past perfect tense as in choice c? I would like to choose the simple past tense.

Thank you in advance for your kind help~

babayu
htchanit
Students
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:05 pm
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by htchanit Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:46 pm

I think I will eliminate "A" & "B" because of "known that". The idiom " known to " sounds better. So I probably pick "C" or "E".

Please help me to correct if I was wrong !
yu.baba2008
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:59 am
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by yu.baba2008 Fri Mar 05, 2010 12:17 am

Is "know to" a correct idiom?
Still confusing.....
Can anyone help, please~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
manjeet.singh
Students
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:29 am
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by manjeet.singh Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:40 pm

I will give it a try

A. it does not have a antecedent

B. it does not have a antecedent

C. Correct

D. "known to be making" seems as men will make stone tools in future

E. meaning absurd..seems some date of humans
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by RonPurewal Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:48 am

yu.baba2008 Wrote:Hi, all

Please can anybody help me with this sentence correction question:

Scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in the fine-grained sediments of a dry riverbed in the Afar region of Ethiopia to between 2.52 and 2.60 million years ago, pushing back by more than 150,000 years the earliest date when it is known that humans made stone tools.

A. when it is known that humans made

B. at which it is known that humans had made

C. at which humans are known to have made

D. that humans are known to be making

E. of humans who were known to make

The ans is c but I chose a. Why a is incorrect?Shouldn't "date" be followed with "when"? And is it necessary to use past perfect tense as in choice c? I would like to choose the simple past tense.

Thank you in advance for your kind help~

babayu


this is one of those problems from which you can learn about the ways in which these sorts of constructions are used. indeed, it is precisely from these sorts of problems that you must learn about the niceties of these constructions, as the gmat's usage can, and does, sometimes vary from that of other sources.

in this sort of construction, i'm pretty sure that either "when" or "at which" would be acceptable. (clearly, the latter is acceptable -- it appears in the correct answer, after all -- but i wouldn't object to the former.)
if you want to get really subtle, i think (not 100% sure) that "the date when" is used for actual, precise calendar dates, whereas "the date at which" is used for the usually more vague dates of historical events, such as the one in this problem. but i'm sure the test is not going to depend on this sort of nuanced difference.

i think the real problem with the construction in choice (a) is that the clause following "when" is "it is known". in other words, that choice suggests that the fact is (was?) known at that date, an interpretation that clearly doesn't make sense in context.
in the correct answer, the "at which" is followed by a clause whose subject is "humans", and which describes the actual action that took place at that date. therefore, i think the idea is that this clause more accurately describes the chronology of the events: i.e., the toolmaking happened at that date, and the fact is known now.

as for your other question, this isn't really a perfect tense, because it's actually not a tense at all -- it's an infinitive.
probably the easiest way to go here is to remember this as an idiomatic usage of the construction "known to". if the action is in the present, then you use "known to VERB"; if the action is in the past, then you use "known to have VERBed". as far as i know, these are the only two possible forms.
vijaykumar.kondepudi
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 9:23 pm
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by vijaykumar.kondepudi Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:51 am

In the correct answer choice:
"at which humans are known to have made",

How do we justify the usage of "are"? Since the action is in past tense, shouldn't we use "were" instead of "are" ?

Please clarify..
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by RonPurewal Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:58 am

vijaykumar.kondepudi Wrote:In the correct answer choice:
"at which humans are known to have made",

How do we justify the usage of "are"? Since the action is in past tense, shouldn't we use "were" instead of "are" ?

Please clarify..


this question has already answered, in the post directly above yours.

see:

in the correct answer, the "at which" is followed by a clause whose subject is "humans", and which describes the actual action that took place at that date. therefore, i think the idea is that this clause more accurately describes the chronology of the events: i.e., the toolmaking happened at that date, and the fact is known now.
Jason.tuyj
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by Jason.tuyj Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:58 am

Pls identify this, is A or C correct???

Since there is controversy between these two choices.



RonPurewal Wrote:
yu.baba2008 Wrote:Hi, all

Please can anybody help me with this sentence correction question:

Scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in the fine-grained sediments of a dry riverbed in the Afar region of Ethiopia to between 2.52 and 2.60 million years ago, pushing back by more than 150,000 years the earliest date when it is known that humans made stone tools.

A. when it is known that humans made

B. at which it is known that humans had made

C. at which humans are known to have made

D. that humans are known to be making

E. of humans who were known to make

The ans is c but I chose a. Why a is incorrect?Shouldn't "date" be followed with "when"? And is it necessary to use past perfect tense as in choice c? I would like to choose the simple past tense.

Thank you in advance for your kind help~

babayu


this is one of those problems from which you can learn about the ways in which these sorts of constructions are used. indeed, it is precisely from these sorts of problems that you must learn about the niceties of these constructions, as the gmat's usage can, and does, sometimes vary from that of other sources.

in this sort of construction, i'm pretty sure that either "when" or "at which" would be acceptable. (clearly, the latter is acceptable -- it appears in the correct answer, after all -- but i wouldn't object to the former.)
if you want to get really subtle, i think (not 100% sure) that "the date when" is used for actual, precise calendar dates, whereas "the date at which" is used for the usually more vague dates of historical events, such as the one in this problem. but i'm sure the test is not going to depend on this sort of nuanced difference.

i think the real problem with the construction in choice (a) is that the clause following "when" is "it is known". in other words, that choice suggests that the fact is (was?) known at that date, an interpretation that clearly doesn't make sense in context.
in the correct answer, the "at which" is followed by a clause whose subject is "humans", and which describes the actual action that took place at that date. therefore, i think the idea is that this clause more accurately describes the chronology of the events: i.e., the toolmaking happened at that date, and the fact is known now.

as for your other question, this isn't really a perfect tense, because it's actually not a tense at all -- it's an infinitive.
probably the easiest way to go here is to remember this as an idiomatic usage of the construction "known to". if the action is in the present, then you use "known to VERB"; if the action is in the past, then you use "known to have VERBed". as far as i know, these are the only two possible forms.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by RonPurewal Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:26 am

Jason.tuyj Wrote:Pls identify this, is A or C correct???

Since there is controversy between these two choices.


jason, the correct answer is cited in the original post. in fact, it's cited in the portion that you quoted.
go back and look for "the ans is..."
thanghnvn
Prospective Students
 
Posts: 711
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:09 pm
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by thanghnvn Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:06 am

I think this question is hard.

one point I want to comment here.

SC tests our ability to realize the correct sentence among many wrong choices which are created by distorting the correct sentence. That is why it is possible that the incorrect choice can be correct if it stand alone. This is basic thinking of SC

The point here is that when gmat distort the correct sentence by distorting the modification created by a adverbial, we have a hard question.
in this case, the adverbial " the day at which" makes a modification which is distorted in all choices but C.
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by jnelson0612 Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:10 pm

Yes, I would agree that looking for those distortions will help you get to where you need to go. It's especially helpful if you can see groups of them together in splits.
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
aps_asks
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:32 pm
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by aps_asks Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:47 am

Hi Instructors ,

What is GMAT trying to test here ?Are they testing Meaning?

Is the usage of the following :
1) at which ( for vague dates )
2) Know to have ( As Ron Pointed out )

the deciding factor in this sentence?

I am facing difficulty with this sentence ?
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by RonPurewal Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:41 pm

aps_asks Wrote:Hi Instructors ,

What is GMAT trying to test here ?Are they testing Meaning?

Is the usage of the following :
1) at which ( for vague dates )
2) Know to have ( As Ron Pointed out )

the deciding factor in this sentence?

I am facing difficulty with this sentence ?


it appears that you are asking about things that have already been addressed earlier in this thread. i.e.,the points you've listed as #1 and #2 here are already discussed above.
if you have a specific question about some other aspect of this problem, feel free to ask. thanks.
jp.jprasanna
Students
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:48 am
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by jp.jprasanna Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:44 pm

hi Ron - Just to confirm - "Know that" is wrong idiom right!

Cheers
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: scientists have dated sharp-edged flakes of stone found in

by tim Mon May 14, 2012 9:55 am

it depends on the context..
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html