Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
aditya8062
Students
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:16 am
 

Re: Shipwrecks are more likely to be found

by aditya8062 Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:24 pm

Good Day Ron
i am not able to understand the following text that you have written in this thread regarding "including"

when you use the word 'including', you have to use it was singular/plural according to the quantities of whatever it refers to. in this case, there is clearly more than one archaeologist / treasure hunter / sport diver, so you'd have to say '...including archaeologists, treasure hunters, and sport divers'.


i have read somewhere in your post that "including" after comma typically acts like a preposition and hence modifies the noun before the comma .now in this question in option C isn't "including" modifying "anyone" . if it is doing so then should we not use singular sense of "archaeologist, treasure hunter, or sport diver" as "anyone" is singular

honestly i had ruled out option C for other solid reasons .but plz correct me if my understanding of "including" is correct

i have also read in your post that "including" is always used to provide a partial list of examples .can this be used to rule out the wrong usage of "including" here as the list detailed in option C with "including" seems exhaustive and not partial
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Shipwrecks are more likely to be found

by RonPurewal Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:48 am

Actually, it's worse than that: "Anyone" is singular, and so refers to only one person at a time. Therefore, it's complete nonsense to state that "anyone" can "include" multiple people.
harika.apu
Students
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:40 am
 

Re:

by harika.apu Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:52 pm

StaceyKoprince Wrote:I think there was a typo in his post there - he meant that, if you use the word "including" here (as choice C does), then you are talking about the class of <whatevers>, so that should be plural.

That's not what the sentence is trying to say, though - the sentence refers to "anyone in scuba gear," so what we say after that should apply to that single person. That one person isn't going to "include" archaelogist, treasure hunter, or sport diver. Rather, that one person could be an archaelogist, or a treasure hunter, or a sport diver.

A and B use a different setup: whether instead of including. Can't use A, though, because it says "anyONE... whether THEY be..." and that's a pronoun error. But B says "anyone, whether A, B, or C." Because "anyone" is singular, that person can only be one thing - you're essentially saying: this one person could be an archaelogist, or a treasure hunter, or a diver.



Hello Stacey,
I have a doubt here.
I learnt that any one means - any one of a group.
anyone means everyone .but both are singular
I don't understand when it means everyone why to specify again few of them by saying including archaeologist,treasure hunter,diver.
Could you please tell if my interpretation is correct.

Thanks:)
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Re:

by RonPurewal Fri Aug 14, 2015 2:10 am

harika.apu Wrote:I don't understand when it means everyone why to specify again few of them by saying including archaeologist,treasure hunter,diver.


...because the writer might want to give a few examples, just to add color/meaning/effect/detail to the sentence.

analogy:
say i'm looking to buy exercise equipment for a hotel.

This exercise equipment can be used by everyone.
This exercise equipment can be used by anyone.

BORING.
these sentences do not make me want to buy the equipment that is advertised.

This exercise equipment can be used by everyone, including teenagers, seniors, and people with disabilities.
This exercise equipment can be used by anyone, whether an athlete or a total beginner.

ok, now THESE sentences make me actually want to buy this equipment!
harika.apu
Students
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:40 am
 

Re: Re:

by harika.apu Sat Aug 15, 2015 12:40 pm

RonPurewal Wrote:
harika.apu Wrote:I don't understand when it means everyone why to specify again few of them by saying including archaeologist,treasure hunter,diver.


...because the writer might want to give a few examples, just to add color/meaning/effect/detail to the sentence.

analogy:
say i'm looking to buy exercise equipment for a hotel.

This exercise equipment can be used by everyone.
This exercise equipment can be used by anyone.

BORING.
these sentences do not make me want to buy the equipment that is advertised.

This exercise equipment can be used by everyone, including teenagers, seniors, and people with disabilities.
This exercise equipment can be used by anyone, whether an athlete or a total beginner.

ok, now THESE sentences make me actually want to buy this equipment!


Hello Ron ,
Thanks for your reply.

:)
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Shipwrecks are more likely to be found

by tim Tue Aug 18, 2015 8:14 am

:)
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Re:

by RonPurewal Wed Aug 19, 2015 5:01 am

you're welcome.
aflaamM589
Students
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:48 am
 

Re: Shipwrecks are more likely to be found

by aflaamM589 Sat Jun 11, 2016 7:30 am

Hello Ron,
A)Shipwrecks are more likely to be found undisturbed at great depths than in shallow coastal waters, which exposes archaeological remains to turbulence and makes them accessible to anyone in scuba gear, whether they be archaeologist, treasure hunter, or sport diver

second they refers to remains by default. also problem?
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Shipwrecks are more likely to be found

by RonPurewal Tue Jun 14, 2016 5:16 am

"they" (plural) CAN'T refer to "anyone (singular) in scuba gear".
that pronoun is clearly intended to refer to people in scuba gear, so, the sentence is wrong... and your thought process about "they" should stop right there.

why would you waste your time wondering "Which WRONG noun could this pronoun refer to?"
Crisc419
Students
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 8:57 am
 

Re: Shipwrecks are more likely to be found

by Crisc419 Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:08 am

RonPurewal Wrote:
gmatalongthewatchtower Wrote:Experts,

What's the difference between:
"The shipwrecks are more likely to be found in Australia than in Europe"

AND

"The shipwrecks are found more likely in Australia than in Europe"?

I am just curious.

Thanks


well, the short version is that the first one is right and the second one is wrong.

in general, when you use "likely" to modify verbs --
* "likely" can be placed after is/are/was/were/etc.
* it can also be placed after other helping verbs (can, well, would, could, and so on)

however...
* i don't think you can ever place "likely" after a verb that isn't one of the verb types mentioned above. in particular, i can't think of any examples in which "likely" can follow an action verb, as in your second sentence above.

so, for instance, the following two sentences are correct:
spencer is likely to fail his driving test tomorrow.
spencer will likely fail his driving test tomorrow.


... but you can't put "likely" after "fail".


hey, Ron,

we cannot place "likely" after a verb, is that because "likely" is used to describe the possibility of one action , the verb is used to describe "a fact" that the action will happen or happened.
so if "likely" is placed after the verb, there will be a logical contradiction between" possiblity "and " fact" . is my reasoning right?

thanks.
Crisc419
Students
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 8:57 am
 

Re: Re:

by Crisc419 Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:24 am

RonPurewal Wrote:
harika.apu Wrote:I don't understand when it means everyone why to specify again few of them by saying including archaeologist,treasure hunter,diver.


...because the writer might want to give a few examples, just to add color/meaning/effect/detail to the sentence.

analogy:
say i'm looking to buy exercise equipment for a hotel.

This exercise equipment can be used by everyone.
This exercise equipment can be used by anyone.

BORING.
these sentences do not make me want to buy the equipment that is advertised.

This exercise equipment can be used by everyone, including teenagers, seniors, and people with disabilities.
This exercise equipment can be used by anyone, whether an athlete or a total beginner.

ok, now THESE sentences make me actually want to buy this equipment!


"including" is in V-ING form, so does it have a problem that it is modifying the subject of the sentence-- shipwrecks? or" including" is an exception?
staceyp29
Students
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:12 pm
 

Re:

by staceyp29 Sun Jun 26, 2016 4:26 am

RonPurewal Wrote:
Anonymous Wrote:Hi Ron,

Thanks for your response.

You mentioned that C has other issues - "the bad usage of 'including' with the list of singular nouns".

I didn't quite get your point. If you don't mind, could you elaborate on the usage of "including" with the list of singular nouns.

Is it valid to use "whether" to refer to a list of items such as "whether X, Y or Z"?

Thanks in advance :)


when you use the word 'including', you have to use it was singular/plural according to the quantities of whatever it refers to. in this case, there is clearly more than one archaeologist / treasure hunter / sport diver, so you'd have to say '...including archaeologists, treasure hunters, and sport divers'.

as for your last question, yes, that construction involving 'whether' is valid.



Hi, thanks for elaborating on the incorrect usage of the word "including" in option C.
However, I'm a bit confused to "anyone" in scuba gear is a plural.
Can you please explain?
Thank you!
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Re:

by RonPurewal Sun Jul 03, 2016 6:01 am

"anyone" is singular. (We'll let you know if anyone finds your bag and gives it to us.)

this isn't tricky -- it even ends with "one"!
jabgt
Students
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:16 pm
 

Re: Shipwrecks are more likely to be found

by jabgt Sun Nov 06, 2016 11:38 am

Dear Experts,

Regarding choice A, besides its all mentioned grammatical errors, may I say the meaning sounds incorrect by its way of wording? I mean, can waters , with its normal state, actively expose something or can waters actively make something accessible to somebody? I feel like only if certain event, such as extreme bad weather, happens to waters, then waters might expose something or make something accesible, since "expose" and "make" are action verbs not state verbs. ( Since English is foreign language to me, if I may, I'd like to form and adjust my ears based on what experts have confirmed. )

Thanks a lot!
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Shipwrecks are more likely to be found

by RonPurewal Fri Nov 11, 2016 1:49 pm

it's possible to say that shallow waters "expose something to turbulence" whereas deeper waters do not.