Verbal questions from any Manhattan Prep GMAT Computer Adaptive Test. Topic subject should be the first few words of your question.
jigar24
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:17 am
 

tennis logic

by jigar24 Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:58 am

If, in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak, the lower-ranked player always loses the tiebreak (and, therefore, the match). If Rafael, the second-ranked player, wins a tournament by beating Roger, the top-ranked player, then the match must not have included a fifth-set tiebreak.

Which of the following arguments most closely mimics the reasoning used in the above argument?
1) If a woman with a family history of twins gets pregnant three times, she will have one set of twins. Jennifer, who falls into this category, had two sets of twins, so she must not have gotten pregnant exactly three times.

2) If a salesman sells more product than anyone else in a calendar year, then he will earn an all-expenses-paid vacation. Joe earned an all-expense-paid vacation, so he must have sold more product than anyone else for the year.

3) A newspaper can charge a 50% premium for ads if its circulation surpasses 100,000; if the circulation does not pass 100,000, therefore, the newspaper can't charge any kind of premium for ads.

4) If a student is in the top 10% of her class, she will earn a college scholarship. Anna is not in the top 10% of her class, so she will not earn a scholarship.

5) All of the players on a football team receive a cash bonus if the team wins the Super Bowl. If quarterback Tom Brady earned a cash bonus last year, he must have been a member of the winning Super Bowl team.








OA- (1)

My question - why is (4) wrong??
thesubjunctive
Course Students
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:23 am
 

Re: tennis logic

by thesubjunctive Mon Nov 30, 2009 2:39 am

The structure of the argument is

If, A [in a tennis tournament, a match reaches a fifth-set tiebreak,] then B [the lower-ranked player always loses the tiebreak (and, therefore, the match)]. If NOT B [Rafael, the second-ranked player, wins a tournament by beating Roger, the top-ranked player,] then NOT A [then the match must not have included a fifth-set tiebreak.]

So, we are looking for a structure similar to If A then B. If not B, then not A.

4) If A [a student is in the top 10% of her class], then B [she will earn a college scholarship.] Not A [Anna is not in the top 10% of her class], then not B [so she will not earn a scholarship.]

Structure: If A then B. Not A then not B. Not what we are looking for.

Answer 1 most closely matches the structure If A then B. If not B, then not A.
Ben Ku
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:49 pm
 

Re: tennis logic

by Ben Ku Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:04 am

Thanks, thesubjunctive. Good explanation.
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
aakashg.0
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 5:41 am
 

Re: tennis logic

by aakashg.0 Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:25 pm

EDITED

D is wrong because

The logic is if A, B. If not B, not A. (4) is If not A, not B.

(1) is If A (pregnant three times) then B (one set of twins). Jennifer = not B (two sets of twins), so not A.
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: tennis logic

by jnelson0612 Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:42 am

Thanks, everyone!
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor