hwilliamsvi Wrote:I initially thought the diagonal of the square to be equal to s√2 which I then squared, and I ran into issues moving forward from there.
that's a legitimate approach, so you must have just been having an off-day with algebra.
as you (correctly) wrote here, the diameter of the larger circle is √2 times the diameter of the smaller circle.
this means that the radius of the larger circle is also √2 times the radius of the smaller circle. so let's call those r and r√2.
in this case, the area of the smaller circle is just (pi)(r^2), while the area of the larger circle is (pi)[(r√2)^2] = pi * 2(r^2). that's exactly twice as big.
--
the real trick here, however, is to realize that there are
no definite values in this problem -- and so you can
PICK YOUR OWN NUMBERS for the diameters/radii of the two circles.
let the diameters of the smaller and larger circles, respectively, be 2 and 2√2. (according to the relationships for squares, the latter of these must be √2 times the former, but apart from that they can have any values whatsoever.)
then the radii are 1 and √2.
therefore, the areas of the circles are pi(1)^2 = 1pi and pi(√2)^2 = 2pi, so the conclusion is immediate.