Hi, I'm very confused about the correct answer of this question. Although I'm not questioning its truth (because the correct answer is always correct), I still want to know how such structure works:
The proposed budget includes more than $1 billion in cuts that will shrink the police department through attrition, have halted some ambulance shifts, and have suspended plastic and glass recycling.
A. have halted some ambulance shifts, and have suspended
B. along with halts in some ambulance shifts, and suspending
C. as well as halted some ambulance shifts, and suspend
D. halt some ambulance shifts, and suspending
E. halt some ambulance shirts, and suspend
OA:E
It seems that "halt some ambulance shirts, and suspend..." are sentence fragments, because they lack a subject. But they could also be interpreted as "omission". What's more, it seems that the "parallelism" takes priority here so the structure is n+v+object.
Could anyone explain how does this structure work?
By the way, I'd like to know whether we could omit the subject after a conjunction if the two actions are done by the same subject. For example, "I went to the shopping mall and bought some cloths". Will it be counted as a "sentence fragment" cos "bought some cloths" is another phrase (which is connected with a conjunction) and it omits the subject "I"? We could certainly say so in speaking English but I'm not sure about how the GMAC view it...
Thank you!