by tim Sun Jul 05, 2015 5:28 am
There is no need for explanation or examples. You had an incorrect understanding of what "for" represents in this context, and now you know the correct usage. Now use the correct usage (what you read in the book) instead of the incorrect usage (whatever you thought was true before you read the book)!
I will mention that in a practical sense, both approaches achieve the same result: requiring an independent clause on either side of the comma.
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html