I would really appreciate if if any of the experts can clear my below doubt.
My issue is when i have 2 noun modifiers modifying a noun and which are separated by AND.
the below sentence is from Manhattan Sentence correction - Guide 8.
Tobacco companies, WHICH have been shaken by a string of legal setbacks in the United States
, but WHICH retain strong growth prospects in the developing world, face an uncertain future
why is there a comma before the AND??
"which have been shaken.." and "which retain..." are parallel relative clauses, so what is the need for the ",AND" wouldn't only AND suffice??
i thought of the solution is a way that the first relative clause is a NON ESSENTIAL modifier, which starts off with a comma and the comma belonging to the Comma AND is just to close off this non essential modifier.
but isn't
WHICH have been shaken by a string of legal setbacks in the United States
but
WHICH retain strong growth prospects in the developing
a single huge non essential modifier???
so why use a "comma AND"
I found the below on a topic discussed a few years back, regarding the use of "CommaAnd" & "And" between 2 verb modifiers
I am ok with this.
modifiers-using-ing-t2083.html
but when it comes to noun modifiers i would need some help.
~Rakesh