Hi,
I find that some of the prompts in CR are not one of the typical categories (draw conclusion, strengthen/weaken, find assumption, explain discrepancies or bold faced). For example, the objection implied above is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements? I know that Ron touched on this topic in one of his Thur. video, but for some reason the recording was cut short. Could someone please explain the approach to weird prompt like this and other bizarre ones?