Diagram

[noah]

Here's a solution sheet - enjoy!

PT67,G3-Manhattan_ LSAT.pdf

(49.35 KiB) Downloaded 1395 times

[shodges]

Is it not advisable to create 4 frames based on the RM (x2 frames) or RF(x2 frames) blocks?

[noah]

Is it not advisable to create 4 frames based on the RM (x2 frames) or RF(x2 frames) blocks?

From a quick glance, I'm seeing a lot of uncertainty in each of those frames (for example, if RF is in 1, P and M is simply restricted from 1, and we don't know much about S and H either.

Did you find those frames useful?

[cpmckenz]

Hey, Noah,

On the solution sheet, for #16, the explanation for answer choice (A) should read "...forces S to 1" -- b/c of rule #4 -- and not "...to 3", as is currently written). Am I missing something?

Rock on,
Colin

[noah]

Hey, Noah,

On the solution sheet, for #16, the explanation for answer choice (A) should read "...forces S to 1" -- b/c of rule #4 -- and not "...to 3", as is currently written). Am I missing something?

Rock on,
Colin

I think you're right! Let me double-check with another geek to make sure we're not overlooking something.

[ohthatpatrick]

Colin, you're correct, although in a way so is the current explanation.

It's just an arbitrary call of whether we say S can't go in spot 1 because of rule 4, or whether we say S can't go in spot 3 because of rule 3.

In my head, rule 4 forced me to put S into column 3, which breaks rule 3.

In your head, rule 3 forced you to put S into column 1, which breaks rule 4.

Tomato, to-mah-to. But we'll try to clear up that language so that it makes sense to either viewpoint. Thanks!