by ohthatpatrick Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:46 pm
I'll offer you some thoughts from a teacher's perspective.
One year of studying is a LOT! I admire your commitment, but you also run a risk of burning out.
Try to mix up the way you study as much as possible. Try different activities with specific goals (f.e. "for 25mins, I will search for Str/Weak questions that deal with causality).
Study with other people and alone. At home and out in the world. In silence and with background music.
Keep a REDO Calendar.
When a Game takes unacceptably long or feels unacceptably difficult, schedule it into your life at lest two more times.
Normally, your 1st redo is 5-10 days later, 2nd redo could be 30 days after that (with your long study schedule).
When an LR question or RC passage is confusing, schedule at least one more redo. I would wait about two weeks before re-trying those.
The general theme is that you're trying to wait until the memory of how to think about / do a problem has started to evaporate from memory. So the better you understood something to begin with, the longer you'll tend to remember it, and thus the longer you'd wait to do a redo.
The less you understood something, the harder it is for you to retain the explanation once you see it, and thus you can redo it sooner.
I do think working with someone else (either a fellow studyier) or a tutor or a class would probably benefit you because you will get exposed to some ideas and you will interact with the material in a very different way (assuming you actively participate in class).
If you're concerned about plateauing, then you might want to try shaking things up sooner, rather than later, so that you have plenty of time to endure the "it gets worse before it gets better" learning curve of trying new things.
Finally, going from 154 to 174 (so that you get a 170 on a bad day) is a Herculean amount of improvement. I don't want to discourage your efforts, but I want to remind you you're aspiring to accomplish something few people can, so don't be surprised if it ends up being very, very challenging.
The most limiting factor at the upper end of the scoring band is simply people's ability to read complex sentences and distill them into simple to understand conversational thoughts, while accurately preserving their nuance.
You would probably be the best judge at this point whether the gnarliest arguments or passages in LR and RC seem realistic / unrealistic in terms of your capacity your understand them.
Good luck!