User avatar
 
LSAT-Chang
Thanks Received: 38
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 479
Joined: June 03rd, 2011
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
trophy
First Responder
 

Passage Discussion

by LSAT-Chang Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:49 pm

Any ideas on the scale of this passage?

I wasn't able to see "two" sides of an argument, but rather just the author acknowledging Haraway's writing style in the book. Did anyone come up with two sides??
User avatar
 
maryadkins
Thanks Received: 641
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: March 23rd, 2011
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Passage Discussion

by maryadkins Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:09 am

This is definitely a rare passage in that it's essentially descriptive.The author is describing all the ways in which Haraway is a renegade, though he/she does reveal a (mild) opinion in the last paragraph that some readers may find her ideas hard to accept. I'd say the "scale" in this case is heavily on the side of "Haraway's writing challenges traditional approaches to the history of science," and the other side is just a question mark.
 
smsotolongo
Thanks Received: 1
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 33
Joined: September 21st, 2014
 
 
 

Re: Passage Discussion

by smsotolongo Wed Sep 30, 2015 3:01 pm

The scale is heavily one sided towards Hathaway, but since this is the "new way of seeing something" passage isn't the old side the other side of the scale? There isn't much to it but it is in it there, even if it's 90-10 scale? She attacks the old way for being outdated but at the end the author does have to make a slight concession.