by ohthatpatrick Tue May 29, 2018 10:04 pm
Yeah, you might see your score dip by a few points (at least in the short term).
Noteworthy differences:
GAMES - fewer weird (I've never seen this before) games, more "I know this type of game but these questions are taking forever" games. You tend to get four medium / medium-hard games in a section, or you get two super-easy ones (5-6 mins) balanced out by a hard one and a unique one.
It's rare to get any easy game without being punished for it elsewhere in the section.
And, from test 60 or so onward, there is a type of question called Rule Equivalency (only one per test, but they're annoying).
LR - Necessary Assumption is getting increasingly challenging, particularly as correct answers are often using conditional logic or sounding stronger than they would have on older tests.
Sufficient Assumption is less about solving for perfect missing links and more about the mindset of, "well --- if I add this to the facts from the evidence, can I derive the conclusion?"
RC - a handful of correct answers have MORE support than other choices but still don't feel like they have ADEQUATE SUPPORT.
correct answers to Main Point are more gist-y. They are less likely to encompass the whole passage (giving you only the author's main clause) and they are less likely to regurgitate wording from a thesis sentence.
Overall, though, the difference just seems to be that there are fewer questions where we get to our correct answer easily and with almost no brainpower. The test as a whole feels more taxing because it seems like you have to work harder for the correct answers that used to come easily.