My thought process for this question -
We're trying to find an answer choice that jeopardizes theoretical equipose but not clinical, so it would have to do with the opinions of the researchers in T.E tipping the scale more in favor towards one treatment over the other.
A) "So strikingly" ; this also says that most physicians favor one over the other. This would affect both clinical and theoretical equipose! It wouldn't be balanced at all, and there is a central consensus, rather than division over how the evidence is interpreted. THIS IS OUT.
B) This on the other hand, doesn't affect clinical or theoretical equipose, what does not being reported even have to do with anything.
C) Hmmm, I don't know if it matters just by what they think, since this answer choice doesn't mention anything about evidence presented... It also says that agrees with the consensus view so I would think that this knocks out both equiposes.
D) Yep! Initial results convince physicians that one treatment is more effective, but there's still a lack of consensus within the community. This sounds like the scenario that the author describes in clinical equipose, and since theoretical equipose would require that the balance be exact, this definitely knocks out theoretical equipose.
E) Both are equally effective, but no consensus within the community as to the relative effectiveness? Huh? The passage didn't mention relative effectiveness at all so I'm not sure how this is useful. On the other hand, since both are equally effective, this really doesn't affect either theoretical or clinical equipose...
D it is!