by bbirdwell Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:25 pm
Here's what you are saying:
Research efforts are justified
THEREFORE
it is probably within the reach of technology to inhabit Mars
Does the first statement really support the second one?
Now consider this:
it is probably within in the reach of technology to inhabit Mars
THEREFORE
research efforts are justified
See the difference? This example is how the argument is logically structured. The fact technology is achievable is what leads to the idea that we should do research. Not the reverse.