lhermary Wrote:why is D wrong?
This is a most strongly supported question. This is where we want to stick as closely to the text as possible.
The stimulus tells us about a one distinctive style of decision makers. This style includes a decision maker seeking a wide range of input from his or her advisers and explore alternatives. The decision maker will sometimes argue for a specific idea by playing up its strengths and playing down its weaknesses. This is not the decision maker arguing for his real beliefs on the specific idea. Rather, the decision maker is wanting to see how his "facade" of defending the idea will invoke the advisers. It will confirm to the decision maker whether his true feelings are unique or commonplace.
The decision maker finds out this information not by expressing his true beliefs on the idea, but rather taking a possible extreme position.
Choice D goes too from the text. We do not know that it is
likely that they will
frequently decide in favor of ideas that they do not believe.
In fact, we are not told
anything about the ultimate decisions that the decision makers render. For example, what if the true beliefs of the decision maker were shown to be idiosyncratic? Or what if the idea was shown to be common?
We cannot make those assumptions from the text given.