by giladedelman Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:45 am
Thanks for the question! This is a great example of how important it is to rigorously compare each answer choice to the core.
Whereas traditional actors portray emotions through imitation, Method actors actually experience them onstage by recalling moments from their own lives. Therefore, according to the author, audiences will find Method performances to be more realistic -- which means, according to the background information in the first sentence, that Method actors will do a better job of reproducing the behaviors that audiences associate with their characters' emotional states.
The gap here is pretty easy to spot: the author is assuming that an actor who actually experiences his character's emotion will reproduce the associated behavior more accurately than an actor who merely tries to imitate that behavior.
(B) is correct because it is indeed necessary to assume that Method actors' behavior will conform to the behavior that audiences associate with the emotion the actor is feeling. If this were not the case, then Method acting would be minimally realistic, according to the argument's definition of realism, and therefore would be as unrealistic, at best, as traditional acting.
So what's wrong with (A)? Well, remember that this argument is about which type of acting audiences will find more realistic. It's NOT about which type of acting will "affect an audience's emotions" more! So this answer choice, since it has nothing to do with realism as defined in the argument, is actually out of scope. We don't care about how emotionally affected the audience is, we care about how realistic it judges a performance to be.
(C) is also out of scope. The argument doesn't actually go into evaluating actors. It could be that this person actually hates realism -- we have no idea.
(D) may be tempting, but the actors' aims are irrelevant. We only care about the results.
(E) is out of scope. Maybe this is true, maybe not; the argument doesn't have anything to do with the requirements for being a Method actor.
Does that answer your question?