by giladedelman Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:57 pm
The passage says, "In disinterment cases, courts have traditionally affirmed the standing of three classes of plaintiffs: the deceased's heirs, the owner of the property on which the grave is located, and parties, including organizations or distant relatives of the deceased, that have a clear interest in the preservation of a particular grave. "
So, whom would the courts not recognize?
(A) is out because they are the deceased's heirs.
(B) is incorrect because this is the owner of the property.
(C) is incorrect because this is an organization with an interested in the preservation -- and, as the passage mentions, it's "of recent historical origin."
(D) is incorrect because this is a family member.
(E) is correct because this party does not appear to have any of the tribal connections mentioned in the passage. Indeed, by definition, if you're seeking the return of artifacts from disparate tribes, you can't have a direct connection to all of them.
Does that answer your question?