Q10

 
hyewonkim89
Thanks Received: 5
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 122
Joined: December 17th, 2012
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
trophy
First Responder
 

Q10

by hyewonkim89 Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:12 am

What makes (C) better than (E)?

Is it because dance forms being variable is out of scope?

Thanks in advance!
 
Yangyi.vita
Thanks Received: 2
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 8
Joined: September 08th, 2013
 
 
 

Re: Q10

by Yangyi.vita Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:14 am

I believe it's not about just the data collection. The context says "peers" recognize areas that is scientifically rigorous as the legitimate areas to focus on, which means dance does not befit the scentific rigor standard. So C wins.
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3808
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
This post thanked 3 times.
 
 

Re: Q10

by ohthatpatrick Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:00 pm

Nice response.

Focus on the context of the whole sentence:
- Dance was NEGLECTED as an area of social research
why?
- because most social scientists want to work in an area of research that was more likely to be recognized by peers as a scientifically rigorous, "legitimate" mode of inquiry.

What's the assumption/inference connecting those two ideas?

Dance is NOT likely to be recognized as a scientifically rigorous, legitimate mode of inquiry.

We just need whatever answer choice gives us the closest paraphrase of that.

(A) 'Misinterpretation' goes beyond what we're looking for.

(B) This is sounding like it's not too hard to obtain reliable data about dance traditions. That sounds more like the opposite of what we want.

(C) Okay, sounds kinda like "dance research is NOT gonna be recognized as a scientifically rigorous, legitimate mode of inquiry".

(D) "too preoccupied" (too busy) isn't a match for what we want.

(E) If true, this strengthens the idea that "dance research is not likely to be good, hard science". But we're not trying to strengthen the idea. We're trying to REITERATE the idea. The whole tidbit about dance forms being too variable across cultures is NOT something we can point to in the passage.

Remember, when question stems say
- suggests
- implies
- inferred
- most likely to agree

the correct answer is a paraphrase of an actual line reference. So we should always be able to justify our answer by pointing at some sentence (or two).

Also, when you're down to 2, in this case (C) vs. (E), ask yourself, "Is there a way in which the test writers are TRYING to make the trap answer appealing?"

(E) re-uses the word 'rigorous' from the passage. Word matching is NOT what most correct answers do. That's what most TRAP answers do. Most correct answers use paraphrases of the actual wording used. (Remember 'ballet' from Q12 in the trap answer vs. 'influenced'/'non-Caribbean' in the correct answer?)

Our correct answer here paraphrases "not scientifically rigorous/legitimate" as "can't be conducted with a high degree of scientific precision".