by ohthatpatrick Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:05 pm
I think you're getting confused about the last rule.
IF we see R, then we need OR.
But you're thinking ....
IF we see O, then we need OR.
However, the rule doesn't say that.
We could show that (C) is possible with a scenario such as this:
M, O, L, Y | R, T
Hope this helps.