KingKai Wrote:Answer A is supported because Passage A paragraph 2 says, "a mistake is accidental and often unforgivable," and Passage B refers to "mistake" inferably: in B, choosing the false memory is a mistake since it's not the real memory, especially since the author would call such a decision unethical (see question 9). However, this mistake is not necessarily unforgivable because the author of B also mentions when it is justified (the emotional power mentioned in paragraphs 2 and 3)
'Choosing' the false memory is not a mistake, since a mistake is accidental. Choosing the false memory would be a lie, since the person so doing is choosing falsehood over truth intentionally, rather than on the supposition that the memory chosen is the correct one.
I still can't find support for (A), aside from the weak support I referenced in the first post I made. Para's 2 and 3 do mention the justifiability of including false memories, but only under conditions in which the memory is known to be false. That excludes the inclusion of false memories thought to be true, i.e. 'mistaken' memories.
Perhaps in the last sentence of para 2 there's support. False memories, i.e. all false memories, whether known to be false (in which case their inclusion would be a lie) or not known to be false (in which case their inclusion would be a mistake), have 'subjective'/'emotional' truths to them, and are therefore good to include. So mistaken memories are good to include, and therefore not 'unforgivable'.
I could have misunderstood your post, or I could be misunderstanding something about the passages, in which case, my bad.