Q12

User avatar
 
ManhattanPrepLSAT2
Thanks Received: 311
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 303
Joined: July 14th, 2009
 
 
 

Q12

by ManhattanPrepLSAT2 Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:42 pm

Here is a solution for this problem.
Attachments
PT64, S2, G2, Q12 - Ambassadorship Assignments- ManhattanLSAT.jpg
(89.69 KiB) Downloaded 1142 times
 
at9037
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 14
Joined: September 08th, 2015
 
 
 

Re: Q12

by at9037 Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:04 pm

How do we know that when N is out, K is in?

I can have an arrangement that says:

K: Venezuela, O: Yemen, L: Zambia

Is this not a possible arrangement?
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3808
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q12

by ohthatpatrick Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:41 am

Yes, your arrangement was legal.

Your scenario was also compatible with the rule
if N is out, K is in.

In your scenario, N was out and K was in.

I'm confused. I thought you were saying, "If that rule were true, wouldn't my (valid) scenario be considered wrong?"

The rule is true, and your scenario is valid.

But to answer your first question,
"how do we know that when N is out, K is in"
that's what rule 1 gives us.

It says that we will always have one of those two IN, and one of them OUT.

If you wanted to, you could derive four conditionals from that:
If K is in, then N is out.
If N is in, then K is out.
If K is out, then N is in.
If N is out, then K is in.