jeastman Wrote:why is E incorrect?
While the survey results were taken in the past, which I suppose all survey results would technically be (!), the arguer does not use that to say that the results will in fact continue to be maintained.
This would be an example of the temporal flaw: what has been the case in the past does not give us sufficient justification that it will continue to do so in the present or future.
However, this flaw is not being committed here. The argument tells us that when a product has more than 50% of the sales in a market, it is dominant.
The author concluded that Hero is dominant. So did the author tell us that Hero had more than 50% of the sales in the market?
No, instead the author tells us that a survey showed 72% of respondents believing Hero was already dominant in the market.
So the author is using opinions of respondents as evidence that Hero is dominant in the market.