mcrittell
Thanks Received: 5
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 154
Joined: May 25th, 2011
 
 
 

Q15 - Statistician: A financial magazine claimed

by mcrittell Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:03 am

I get why E is correct, but I'm unsure why C is incorrect.
 
mcrittell
Thanks Received: 5
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 154
Joined: May 25th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q15 - Statistician: A financial magazine claimed

by mcrittell Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:08 am

Is C incorrect because it casts doubt on the validity of the surveys in question--thus strengthening the statistician's conclusion?
User avatar
 
ManhattanPrepLSAT1
Thanks Received: 1909
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: October 07th, 2009
 
This post thanked 2 times.
 
 

Re: Q15 - Statistician: A financial magazine claimed

by ManhattanPrepLSAT1 Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:23 pm

You got it! But for others who might be looking at this same question, let's just flush this one out.

The conclusion drawn by the statistician is a criticism of a claim by a financial magazine that North Americans are more concerned with personal finances than with politics. The evidence the statistician uses is both a claim about the representativeness of the survey's readership and potential bias in the way the survey phrased it's questions.

We're asked to strengthen the criticism of the financial magazine's claim - or in other words weaken the financial magazine's claim.

Each of the incorrect answers will strengthen the argument:

(A) casts doubt on the credibility of the financial magazine and would weaken their claim, thereby strengthening the argument.
(B) gives us reason to believe, though far from proves, that the magazine will be found to be inaccurate in their current claim.
(C) calls into question the survey's accuracy by presenting other survey's that would have to be considered plausible until considered more thoroughly - thus strengthening the statistician's criticism.
(D) strengthens the criticism of the survey since this survey, according to the statistician is both unrepresentative and biased.


That leaves us with answer choice (E). This answer is irrelevant since it brings in something wholly unconnected with the argument and doesn't help us establish a relative importance between the two issues of personal finance and politics.

Doest that answer your question? And thanks for bringing this one to the forum!
 
Dtodaizzle
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 24
Joined: February 08th, 2015
 
 
 

Re: Q15 - Statistician: A financial magazine claimed

by Dtodaizzle Wed Dec 30, 2015 6:39 pm

What if we change the wording to answer choice B-

The conclusion drawn in *some* magazine surveys have been disproved.

What this then be a valid answer? (We know that "some" (<50%) of the magazine surveys have been disproved, but we don't know if the remaining ones have or have not been disproved.
User avatar
 
maryadkins
Thanks Received: 641
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: March 23rd, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q15 - Statistician: A financial magazine claimed

by maryadkins Wed Jan 06, 2016 5:41 pm

It would be weaker for sure. I'm not sure if you are asking how it would compare to (E), but if so I think (E) would still be weaker since it's irrelevant.