Q15

 
gethornburg
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 7
Joined: June 29th, 2010
 
 
 

Re: PT 59, Game 3

by gethornburg Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:59 am

#15 ...

i suggest that the key is recognizing that S9 removes P and G removes w. The inference is two of the three remaining subjects, R,M and J must be selected. Here the chain of M > ~J > R is crucial because the contrapositive inference ~R > ~M provides the correct inference.
User avatar
 
ManhattanPrepLSAT1
Thanks Received: 1909
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: October 07th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q15

by ManhattanPrepLSAT1 Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:42 pm

Here's my run through for this question!
Attachments
PT59, S1, G3, Q15 - Class Schedule - ManhattanLSAT.pdf
(50.5 KiB) Downloaded 851 times
 
shingctse
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 3
Joined: October 25th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q15

by shingctse Fri Nov 25, 2011 7:59 pm

I am having difficulties with understanding why B.) Macroeconomics would not be a viable answer as well.

Based on the rules, the only options left are Macroeconomics, Japanese, and Russian. Yes, M and J cannot go together, so B must be it.

However, J and R cannot go together, meaning she would have to take Macroeconomics.

So I feel that B.) Macro and D.) Russian are equally correct. Can someone explain to me why they aren't?

--EDIT--

Found out why I wasn't getting the right answer. I made a false inference, thinking J and R couldn't go together. Right. Thanks!