by noah Sun Nov 14, 2010 5:35 pm
Your explanation of why (D) is correct is perfect for (B). But (D) is stronger than you need - and we're looking for a required (necessary) assumption. We don't need most Japanese to choose a North American car when faced with two choices that both have steering wheels on the right. We just need that the fact that a steering wheel is on the left to negatively impact a Japanese consumer's estimation of a car.
The core of this argument is:
Japanese drive on left --> The fact that North American cars have steering wheels on the left is an obstacle to increased sales in Japan.
If we negate (B), Japanese would be inclined to buy cars with steering wheels on the left, and the argument wouldn't make sense!
If we negate (D), North American cars with steering wheels on the right would not be more popular than Japanese cars, but perhaps they'd sell well enough to see sales rise.
(A) is out of scope. Reliability? Fuel Efficiency?
(C) is irrelevant. Why the Japanese prefer steering wheels on the left is not important to the argument.
(E) may sound tempting, but "needs" is very vague. Perhaps which side the steering wheel is on is a stylistic issue, not a "need" issue. Furthermore, the "only" in this answer is problematic. Why is it required that what (E) says be the ONLY way to deal with the trade imbalance?
Does that clear it up?