For this question I chose (B) because (E) didn't seem directly supported by the passage. In line 30 or so it specifically says "partial determinant of an individual's actions," but it's not directly referring to contingencies, it's referring to the structures formed from these contingencies. Can we justify (E) then by saying that since the contingencies at least partially determine those structures, and the structures partially determine actions, that the contingencies themselves partially determine the actions? (Without committing the part-to-whole fallacy?)
Thanks!