Q18

[datchao]

Gong back to this question I am not seeing how E is the correct answer ?

There doesn't seem to be any constants stopping either S or T from being in H

Is the falseness because you could have either S or T in H?

[ohthatpatrick]

"Could be false" (optional) is the opposite of "Must be true".

So four of these answer choices are mandatory, must be true, and should be eliminated.

The remaining answer choice is flexible, could be false, and will be correct.

From the condition of this question, we know that R will be alone in I.

F: __ __
G: __ __
H: __ __
I: r
L: __ __

Where the other R go? It can't be G or H, so it would have to F or L.
And R has to be with S's 1st.
We could put S's 1st on L, so we'd have to put S's 1st, and therefore the other R, into F.

F: s r
G: __ __
H: __ __
I: r
L: __ __

We still need to get "tq" into G or H. But q can't be F or H.
So "tq" has to go into G.

F: s r
G: t q
H: __ __
I: r
L: __ __

we still have another t, another s, another q

s and t can't be together, so we have to split them among H and L
q can't go in F or H, so the other q has to go into L.

F: s r
G: t q
H: s/t
I: r
L: q t/s

Since the whole scenario is set in stone, except for t/s in H vs. L, we would expect the correct answer to be about the flexibility of t/s.

A) must be true
B) must be true
C) must be true
D) must be true
E) flexible ... it could be false ... it might be s in Handling People and t in Leadership.