by ohthatpatrick Fri Nov 02, 2018 11:17 pm
Do you do all the questions in order?
I, and a lot of other teachers, do the questions in this order:
1. Orientation (assuming there is one)
2. IF questions (including "fully determined" questions)
3. Everything else
We do the IF questions 2nd so that we have as many previous work scenarios to look at when we go to do other questions.
From Q20, I have
L M J F [G K] <--> H
From Q21, I have
L (F, H) G K M J
From Q22, I have
L (F, M - J) G K H
So when Q19 asks me where J can't go, I start by asking, "Where do I know J can go? Where have I seen it before?"
I've seen it in spot 3, spot 7, and spot 4.
That gets rid of (B) and (E).
At this point, you resort to plug and chug. Since the only rule for J is
M - J, you're more likely to mess things up by putting J early than by putting J late. So I would start with (A).
The rest of this explanation would just duplicate other people's plug and chug work.
Overall, try not to have a strong aversion to plug and chug. It's okay / appropriate that you're asking whether there's a clever alternative, but the reality is that most of the time the clever alternative (if it exists) doesn't occur to us in realtime.
My biggest strength in GAMES has nothing to do with upfront inferences or clever approaches to individual questions.
I get 'em all right (with time to spare, usually) just by writing out lots of scenarios. So it's not untenable, as many students fear, to resort to writing things out.
I don't even want people to think they're "resorting" to it, as though that move is to be avoided as much as possible.
Just trying stuff out is the name of the game. Good luck!